🔗 Share this article

Tehran is prepared to reinitiate atomic negotiations with Washington provided that it is handled with "respect" and "respect", Iran's top diplomat has declared.

Abbas Araghchi said exclusively dialogue worked, and revealed new appeals had been made by mediators to reopen discussions with the Trump administration. He claimed Iran had zero unreported enrichment locations, and Tehran could not yet allow the global atomic watchdog to access attacked atomic facilities for security reasons.

Navigating a Complex Course

Araghchi is navigating a complex path since Iran wishes not to be perceived to be operating from a stance of vulnerability, and he insisted repeatedly that Iran had come out more resilient defensively and emotionally from the coordinated strike on its enrichment centers in June.

He was speaking at a security conference in Tehran where he reiterated that Iran had "a fundamental entitlement to enrich uranium on home soil that it will never give up" – the main reason of the deadlock in the prior discussions.

Previous Discussions Unexpectedly Terminated

The earlier sessions of talks between the US and Iran were ended suddenly and acrimonious termination on 12 June when the Israeli government, with American backing, struck Iranian nuclear sites in a two-week conflict that culminated with the US president claiming the facilities had been eliminated. Following this, EU nations exercised their privilege to restore international penalties, but Iran asserts they have not had a significant effect.

Magic Solution Proposed

Iranian officials stated they felt they had attained a "ideal resolution" to the enrichment issue in prior discussions, when it was agreed an local partnership with US participation could refine atomic fuel. Each party would have been able to assert triumph since domestic enrichment would have remained and the US could be certain that Iran's nuclear programme was entirely non-military.

It had not been decided in the discussions that Washington's technical specialists could operate within Iranian territory, but that was a reasonable assumption of the partnership suggestion. Representatives claimed three times they had achieved a deal with the US representative the US official only for the arrangement to disintegrate due to "opponents in the US".

Present Position

Iran's diplomats stated the consortium offer was now no longer available, but it seems highly likely the offer could be reintroduced in various formats if discussions resume.

The US president last week said he had been receiving messages that Iran sought to reopen negotiations, but confidentially Tehran representatives state they are not yet getting coherent offers from Washington either explicitly or from key regional mediators, such as Qatar, the Egyptian leadership, Oman and Saudi Arabia. The Iranian foreign ministry has been accused of non-responsiveness in the aftermath of Trump's direct instinctive approach, but Iran asserts negotiations is not part of a show.

Political Position

In his remarks to the forum, intended to portray the US as a dominant force that exploits the concept of global regulations, the foreign minister declared the fortnight-long engagement demonstrated the conflict could not be settled by military means. He said the assaults began with a American requirement for an unconditional Iranian surrender and culminated with an absolute demand for a halt to hostilities.

Iran is certain the opening assaults from Tel Aviv were executed with complete American awareness and collaboration, making faith hard to restore.

Negotiations Continues the Ultimate Answer

Araghchi declared: "It was not Iran that had deserted dialogue; it was America and the western countries that had always attempted to enforce their desires during the talks. Diplomacy can still be viable and continues the primary solution to address disputes, but its standards, guidelines and principles must be followed."

"If they address to the nation of Iran with the language of respect and honor, they will obtain a answer in the identical tone."

Recovery and Recovery

In what is portrayed by Iran's diplomats as the conflict of restoration and recovery, the foreign minister said he was certain Iran's security strengths "have significantly improved than before 13 or 14 June of this year. All our capabilities have been restored. We learned numerous insights from this war; we have identified our internal vulnerabilities and the vulnerabilities of the enemy."

He stated: "We managed to survive this conflict. Our atomic expertise, which they intended to obliterate, remains in place. The facilities and machinery, if destroyed, will be reconstructed; what is crucial is the will of the citizens of Tehran and then the social solidarity that they aimed at, but failed to shatter. The citizens of Tehran have become more powerful, more united, and more endorsing of the leadership and the state in the face of this invasion."